Science & Media Accuracy
Is Climate Change Real and Human-Caused?
Temperature records, carbon dioxide, the oceans, sea level and ice; the attribution science that splits the warming by cause; and how news coverage has reported it, from the years when it gave doubt equal weight to the framings that still oversimplify it.
Jump to the verdict ↓
Primary sources used
NASA GISTEMP
NOAA GlobalTemp
Berkeley Earth
HadCRUT5
Mauna Loa CO₂
Cheng et al. ocean heat
NASA Sea Level
NSIDC Arctic Ice
WGMS Glaciers
IPCC AR6 WG1
Copernicus and WMO
IMBIE ice sheets
The short answer
Yes, and yes. The planet is about 1.1 °C warmer than in 1850 to 1900 on the IPCC’s assessment of four independent temperature records, and 2024 was the warmest year yet measured. The IPCC’s best estimate of the human share is all of it, with the sun and volcanoes adding at most a tenth of a degree either way. The fingerprints point the same way: the stratosphere is cooling, nights are warming faster than days, and less heat escapes to space in the bands where carbon dioxide absorbs. What remains uncertain is how much warming a doubling of carbon dioxide brings, likely 2.5 to 4 °C, and how fast the ice sheets will shrink.
The records kept by five teams
The oldest objection to the temperature record is that it cannot be trusted: skewed by towns growing up around weather stations, or kept by a few institutions with a stake in the answer. It is in fact kept several times over. NASA and NOAA in the United States, the Met Office with the University of East Anglia in Britain, the independent nonprofit Berkeley Earth and the European Copernicus service each build a global series from their own choice of stations, ships, buoys and methods. Here are four of their figures for 2024, the WMO’s figure combining them with others, and the IPCC’s assessment of 2011 to 2020:
NASA GISTEMP
+1.47 °C
NOAA GlobalTemp
+1.46 °C
WMO consolidated estimate
+1.55 °C (±0.13)
Copernicus ERA5
+1.60 °C
Berkeley Earth (January 2025 report)
+1.62 °C
IPCC AR6 assessment, 2011–2020 average
+1.09 °C (likely 0.95 to 1.20 °C)
Sources: NASA’s and NOAA’s January 2025 releases; Copernicus’s Global Climate Highlights 2024, which also reports the WMO’s consolidated figure; Berkeley Earth’s report for 2024; IPCC AR6 WGI, SPM A.1.2, for the decade, an assessment of four records: the Met Office’s HadCRUT5, NOAAGlobalTemp, Berkeley Earth and Kadow et al. The same assessment puts 2001–2020 at 0.99 °C.
The 2024 figures run from 1.46 to 1.62 mostly because each analysis sets the 1850–1900 starting line in a slightly different place, which is how Copernicus explains the spread in its 2024 report. Agreement among teams using different stations and methods cannot exclude an error they all share. It does exclude an error in one team’s choices, which is what the objection usually alleges.
2024 and the 1.5 °C line
Whether 2024 was the first calendar year above 1.5 °C, the level the Paris Agreement names, depends on whose analysis you read: it was on Copernicus’s, Berkeley Earth’s and the WMO’s consolidated figure, and it fell a few hundredths short on NASA’s and NOAA’s. Berkeley’s report had already put 2023 above the line, at 1.54. 2025 came in at 1.44 °C on the WMO’s consolidated figure, third on six of the eight datasets it uses and second on NASA’s and one other; Berkeley Earth’s 2025 report also puts it at 1.44, third. The eleven warmest years on record are the last eleven, 2015 to 2025, on all eight datasets. (Berkeley’s 1.62 for 2024 is from its January 2025 report. Its 2025 report puts 2025 at 1.44 and 0.08 °C cooler than 2024, so its current figure for 2024 is about 1.52.)
Download this conclusion: the 1.5 °C line
This card sets out why 2024 is counted both above and below 1.5 °C: Copernicus, the WMO and Berkeley Earth put it above, NASA and NOAA just under, and the spread comes mostly from where each analysis sets the 1850–1900 starting line. Anyone may download it and post it.
Download the card (PNG, 1,200 × 630)
Global Surface Temperature Anomaly (°C)
How to read it: each bar is one year’s global average, every second year from 1980, measured against NASA’s 1951 to 1980 average rather than the 1850 to 1900 baseline the 1.5 °C target uses, so the bars sit about 0.2 to 0.3 lower than the headline figures elsewhere on this page; 2024’s 1.28 here is NASA’s 1.47 against 1850 to 1900. The values are NASA’s (the mirror of its 1880 to 2015 table for the earlier years, its own releases for 2016, 2020, 2022 and 2024); much of the year-to-year wobble is El Niño and La Niña (NASA estimates La Niña held 2022 down by about 0.06 °C), and the climb is the trend.
The urban heat island objection
The urban version of the objection has been tested head on. Berkeley Earth compared the trends at all 39,028 of its sites with those at 16,132 “very rural” sites, picked from satellite imagery to lie well away from any town, and over 1950 to 2010 found the opposite of an urban warming effect, a small one inside its own margin of error (Wickham et al., as reported by Carbon Brief). Cities are warmer than the country around them, but about 99% of the Earth’s surface is not city. Satellites, which measure the lower atmosphere and have no weather stations for buildings to crowd, show the troposphere warming as well (Karl et al., 2006; Santer et al., 2013).
The Mauna Loa record
Carbon dioxide has been measured at Mauna Loa in Hawaii since March 1958, when Charles Keeling of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography took the first reading, 313 ppm. Scripps and NOAA now run separate measurements there, and the annual figures on this page are NOAA’s.
Pre-industrial level (ice cores)
~280 ppm
Mauna Loa annual mean, 1959 (first full year)
316.0 ppm (first reading, March 1958: 313)
2010 annual mean
390.1 ppm
2020 annual mean
414.2 ppm
2024 annual mean
424.6 ppm
Change 2010–2024
+34.5 ppm (+8.8%)
May monthly peak, 2025 and 2026 (NOAA)
430.5 and 432.3 ppm
Current level vs. 800,000-yr ice-core record
Highest in 800,000 years
Atmospheric CO₂ at Mauna Loa Observatory (ppm), annual means 2010 to 2024
How to read it: one point per year, the annual mean at one mountaintop observatory in Hawaii, on a vertical axis that starts at 385 rather than zero so the rise since 2010 is visible. The whole rise, 34.5 ppm, is 8.8% of the 2010 level, and the line does not turn down in any year.
The greenhouse mechanism
Fourier worked out in 1824 that the atmosphere keeps the surface warmer than sunlight alone could. In 1859 Tyndall found out which part of it, in his laboratory at the Royal Institution in London: oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen let infrared radiation through, while water vapour, carbon dioxide and methane absorb it. In 1896 Arrhenius calculated what doubling the carbon dioxide would do to the temperature. The same absorption now shows from orbit, as a dip in the infrared leaving the planet in the bands where carbon dioxide absorbs (see the fingerprint table below).
Greenhouse warming and warming from a brighter sun would leave different marks. Greenhouse gases would cool the stratosphere, warm nights faster than days and cut the heat escaping in the carbon dioxide bands; a brighter sun would warm the stratosphere too and warm days fastest. The attribution section sets out which marks have been found.
The CO₂ "natural fluctuation" argument
Critics are right that carbon dioxide has varied naturally, between about 180 ppm in ice ages and 280 ppm in the warm periods between them, over the 800,000 years the ice cores cover. The difference now is speed. The annual mean has risen about 145 ppm above the pre-industrial 280, and NOAA puts today’s rate of increase at more than 100 times the rate at the end of the last ice age.
How the extra carbon is traced to fossil fuel
The extra carbon dioxide carries a mark of where it came from. Fossil fuels are ancient plant matter, poor in carbon-13 and with no carbon-14 left, so burning them lowers the share of both isotopes in the air, a fall known as the Suess effect. NOAA puts the carbon-13 signature of the atmosphere at about −6.5 parts per thousand before the industrial revolution and about −8 now; the decline has been measured directly since 1978 and in ice cores back to the start of industry (Keeling et al., 2017).
Where most of the heat goes
Most of the extra heat does not stay in the air. About 90% of it goes into the ocean (Cheng et al., 2024), so the heat stored in the upper 2,000 m tracks the energy the planet is gaining more closely than the surface temperature does.
2021
Record high
2022, over 2021
+10.9 ± 8.3 ZJ, record
2023, over 2022
+15 ± 10 ZJ (IAP); +9 ± 5 ZJ (NCEI), record
2024, over 2023
+16 ± 8 ZJ, record
2025, over 2024
+23 ± 8 ZJ, record
Records in a row
Every year since 2017 (Cheng et al., 2024)
Sources: Cheng et al.’s annual assessments in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, which set the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ analysis beside NOAA NCEI’s and Copernicus Marine’s; Pan, Cheng et al. (2026) for 2025. A zettajoule (ZJ) is 1021 joules.
Sea level rise
Since 1993 global sea level has been measured from space by a chain of five satellites, from TOPEX/Poseidon to Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich. Before that the record comes from tide gauges, which NASA’s reconstruction takes back to about 1900 (Frederikse et al., 2020).
Rate, 1901 to 1971 (IPCC AR6)
1.3 mm/year
Rate, 1971 to 2006 (IPCC AR6)
1.9 mm/year
Rate, 2006 to 2018 (IPCC AR6)
3.7 mm/year
Rate in 1993 and now (NASA satellite record)
2.0 mm/year then, 4.4 now
Rate in 2024 (NASA)
5.9 mm/year, against an expected 4.3
Change in the annual rate since 1993 (NASA)
More than doubled
Total rise since 1993
10.7 cm (4.2 inches) to the latest reading; 102 ± 4 mm at January 2025 (NASA)
Primary drivers
Ice melt about two-thirds, thermal expansion one-third in recent years; reversed in 2024
How fast the sea is rising: millimetres a year, by period
How to read it: each bar is the average rate over its period, so the last bar, one year, is more variable than the three long ones; the point is the direction, each period faster than the last. The first three are the IPCC’s figures from tide gauges and satellites; the 2024 bar is NASA’s satellite figure.
The rate matters as much as the total, because it has more than doubled over the satellite record. In recent years about two-thirds of the rise came from ice melting on land and a third from seawater expanding as it warms; in 2024 the shares reversed, with thermal expansion behind two-thirds of it (NASA, 2025).
Arctic sea ice extent
The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) has tracked Arctic sea ice extent using satellite passive microwave data continuously since 1979, a 47-year record with no surface stations in it. The 2025 minimum, 4.60 million square kilometres on 10 September, tied for the tenth lowest; the last 19 years are the 19 lowest in the record, and NSIDC notes that within those 19 years there has been no significant trend.
Long-term trend (September minimum)
−12% per decade since 1979
2025 minimum
2025 minimum 4.60 million sq km, tied tenth lowest; the last 19 years the 19 lowest
Arctic amplification
Nearly four times the global rate over 1979 to 2021 (Rantanen et al., 2022)
Measurement method
Satellite passive microwave (no station bias)
Global glaciers
The World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS) keeps the records of about 60 reference glaciers with more than 30 years of continuous measurement, and 142 glaciers reported for 2024. Mass balance, the difference between snow accumulation and melt, has been negative for the reference network in every year since 1988, 37 years running, and the losses have grown each decade.
m w.e. is metres of water equivalent lost from the glacier surface. The decade figures are the reference network’s averages as reported by Mauri Pelto in the State of the Climate series; the 2022 to 2024 figures are WGMS’s regionalised global averages.
The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets
Ice sheets are a different category from mountain glaciers: the continental ice over Greenland and Antarctica. The satellite-era reconciliation, IMBIE, combines estimates from three independent techniques (altimetry, which measures the height of the surface; gravimetry, which weighs the ice from orbit; and the input-output method, which sets snowfall against the ice flowing out) and finds that the two sheets together added 21.0 ± 1.9 mm to sea level from 1992 to 2020, with the loss rising from 105 billion tonnes a year in 1992–1996 to 372 billion in 2016–2020 (Otosaka et al., 2023). The techniques agree closely on Greenland. On East Antarctica they do not even agree on the sign, and IMBIE puts it close to balance; the Antarctic loss comes from West Antarctica and the Peninsula.
The IPCC attribution analysis
Attribution asks how much of the observed warming each cause produced. The IPCC’s 2021 physical-science report, which assessed more than 14,000 publications, gives these figures for 2010–2019 against 1850–1900.
Well-mixed greenhouse gases (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, F-gases)
+1.0 °C to +2.0 °C (likely range)
Other human drivers (aerosols, ozone, land-use change), net
−0.8 °C to 0.0 °C (aerosols mask part of the GHG warming)
All human influences combined
+0.8 °C to +1.3 °C (best: +1.07 °C)
Natural forcings (solar + volcanic)
−0.1 °C to +0.1 °C
Internal variability (El Niño, ocean cycles)
−0.2 °C to +0.2 °C; cannot explain the multi-decadal trend
Observed warming, 2010–2019 vs 1850–1900
+1.06 °C (very likely 0.88 to 1.21)
The marks that tell the causes apart
The table sets each cause’s predicted marks against what the records show.
Fingerprint
GHG prediction
Solar prediction
Observed
Stratosphere
Cooling (heat trapped below)
Warming (more solar input)
Cooling, measured by satellites and weather balloons (Karl et al., 2006; Santer et al., 2013) ✓ GHG
Troposphere
Warming
Warming
Warming (both consistent)
Night vs. Day
Nights warming faster
Days warming faster
Nights warming faster: over land the daily range narrowed by about 0.4 °C in the second half of the twentieth century, minimums rising about 0.9 and maximums about 0.6 (Braganza et al., 2004) ✓ GHG
Outgoing IR radiation
Decreasing in CO₂ bands
No change specific to the CO₂ bands
Decreasing in the CO₂ and methane bands between the 1970 and 1997 satellite spectra (Harries et al., 2001), confirmed to 2006 (Griggs and Harries, 2004; Chen et al., 2007) ✓ GHG
Downward IR at surface
Increasing
Not applicable
Increasing at the surface, 1973 to 2008 (Wang and Liang, 2009), with the rise attributable gas by gas in spectral measurements (Evans, 2006) ✓ GHG
Solar variation
Total solar irradiance has been measured from satellites since late 1978, by a chain of overlapping instruments (Nimbus-7, the ACRIM series, ERBS, SOHO, SORCE). The record shows the 11-year cycle and little else: the two rival composites disagree about a two-year gap in 1989 to 1991, so one (ACRIM) shows a slight rise from 1980 to 2000 and the other (PMOD) a slight decline, but both show a decline since about 2000, the period in which the surface warmed fastest. The IPCC puts the whole natural contribution to warming since 1850–1900, solar and volcanic together, between −0.1 and +0.1 °C.
Where coverage tracks science accurately
Most coverage now gets the core conclusions right; the false-balance studies below measure how far that has changed. The consensus figure comes from surveys of papers rather than of scientists, and it holds. Cook et al. (2013) found that 97% of the abstracts from 1991 to 2012 that took a position endorsed human causation; Lynas et al. (2021) found four sceptical papers in a random sample of 3,000 from the 88,125 climate papers published from 2012 to 2020, with 69% of the sample taking no position and more than 99.9% of the rest endorsing it.
Where media coverage diverges from the IPCC
The false balance problem
In earlier decades much coverage practised false balance, setting the scientific position and its contrarian opponents side by side as if they carried equal weight. Boykoff and Boykoff (Global Environmental Change, 2004) read 636 articles on the human contribution from the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times and the Wall Street Journal, 1988 to 2002: 52.7% gave roughly equal attention to the two positions, 35.3% emphasised the human role while presenting both, 6.2% emphasised doubt and 5.8% carried only the scientific position. A later study of 4,856 articles from 17 papers in five countries, 2005 to 2019, found 90% represented the science accurately, with accuracy improving over the period (McAllister et al., Environmental Research Letters, 2021).
Contrarian funding and influence
Brulle (Climatic Change, 2014) counted 91 U.S. organisations opposing limits on emissions, with a combined income of just over $900 million a year in 2003 to 2010, of which $64 million a year was traceable foundation money; the total is their whole income, not their spending on climate, as Brulle himself noted. Oreskes and Conway, Brulle and Supran and Oreskes (2017) have documented concerted and funded efforts to manufacture doubt about climate science, drawing parallels to tobacco industry tactics. ExxonMobil’s own scientists, in internal memos and published papers between 1977 and 2003, projected warming of 0.20 ± 0.04 °C a decade, which is what has happened, while the company’s public statements disputed the science; the projections were assessed from the company’s records by Supran, Rahmstorf and Oreskes (Science, 2023).
The strongest sceptic case
Argument
Strongest version
Sensitivity
How much warming a doubling of CO₂ brings, the equilibrium climate sensitivity, is still a range: the IPCC’s best estimate is 3 °C, likely 2.5 to 4 and very likely 2 to 5. The low end implies much less harm than the high end, and a policy sized for the middle of the range would cost more than it needed to if the true value turned out low.
Regional complexity
Global averages hide large regional differences. Some places gain in some respects, longer growing seasons at high latitudes and ice-free shipping routes among them, and who bears the harm matters as much as the global total.
Model limitations
Regional projections are less certain than global ones, because natural variability matters more at regional scales and in the near term (IPCC, SPM C.1). Some processes, ice-sheet instability above all, are understood so poorly that the IPCC leaves them out of its likely ranges. The uncertainty cuts both ways, but it is real.
Adapt vs. mitigate
Some economists, William Nordhaus most prominently, have argued for a “policy ramp”: modest cuts now and sharper ones later, because future costs are discounted at about 4 to 5% a year, against the 1.4% of the Stern Review. The optimal path in his 2013 model warmed the world by about 3 °C by 2100. The dispute is about economics and ethics, how much a future harm counts today, and both sides accept the physical science.
The answer
Each of these is an argument about how much harm to expect and what to do about it. None of them disputes the measured warming or its attribution to people.
The strongest case that it is worse than projected
Argument
Strongest version
Tipping points
The central projections may understate the danger. The IPCC says low-likelihood outcomes (ice-sheet collapse, abrupt changes in ocean circulation, some compound extremes, and warming well beyond its very likely range) cannot be ruled out, and that their probability rises with warming (SPM C.3). The sea-level storyline approaching 2 m by 2100 is one of them, kept out of the likely range because the processes behind it are poorly understood.
Damage undercounting
The standard cost models may leave the worst out. DICE, the model behind the policy ramp, does not account for climate tipping points, as Nordhaus himself noted, and harms with no market price, lost species and ecosystems among them, are hard to put in at all.
The answer
These are legitimate arguments about risk, and the IPCC counts them in its risk assessment rather than its central projections. Which outcomes arrive depends on emissions: the likely sea-level rise by 2100 runs from 0.28 to 0.55 m on the lowest pathway to 0.63 to 1.01 m on the highest.
Key numbers
1.09 °C
Global warming above pre-industrial levels (2011–2020 average) on the IPCC’s assessment of four independent temperature records; the analyses put 2024 alone between 1.46 and 1.62.
424.6 ppm
Mauna Loa’s annual mean CO₂ in 2024, up from 390.1 ppm in 2010; the May 2026 monthly peak was 432.3 ppm. The highest in 800,000 years of ice-core records.
~10 cm
Sea level rise since 1993 on NASA’s satellite record, with the annual rate more than doubled over the period and 5.9 mm in 2024 alone.
−12% / decade
The decline in the September minimum extent over 1979 to 2024, relative to the 1981–2010 average, in NSIDC’s satellite record.
9 years
Years in a row of record ocean heat content in the upper 2,000 m, every year since 2017 through 2025. The ocean takes up about 90% of the extra heat.
±0.1 °C
The IPCC’s range for the contribution of the sun and volcanoes to the warming from 1850–1900 to 2010–2019. Human influence, greenhouse gases less the cooling from aerosols, accounts for all of the observed warming on its best estimate.
Claims and evidence
Claim“Climate change is a hoax, or not real”
EvidenceIt is real. The IPCC’s assessment of four surface records (the Met Office’s HadCRUT5, NOAA’s, Berkeley Earth’s and one by Kadow and colleagues) puts 2011–2020 at 1.09 °C above 1850–1900 (likely 0.95 to 1.20). For 2024 the analyses of NASA, NOAA, Copernicus and Berkeley Earth ran from 1.46 to 1.62, and on all eight datasets the WMO uses, the eleven warmest years on record are the last eleven, 2015 to 2025.
Claim“It’s just natural cycles”
EvidenceNot on the IPCC’s attribution for 2010–2019 against 1850–1900: human influence contributed 1.07 °C net (likely 0.8 to 1.3), made up of 1.0 to 2.0 °C from greenhouse gases offset by 0.0 to 0.8 °C of cooling from aerosols and other human drivers; natural drivers, solar and volcanic, contributed between −0.1 and +0.1 °C, and internal variability between −0.2 and +0.2. The fingerprint, a warming troposphere over a cooling stratosphere, is the one greenhouse gases leave; a brighter sun would warm both.
Claim“CO₂ has always fluctuated, nothing unusual”
EvidenceIt has, between about 180 ppm in ice ages and 280 ppm in the warm periods between, over 800,000 years of ice cores, and it held near 280 for the 10,000 years before industry. Mauna Loa’s annual mean went from 390.1 ppm in 2010 to 424.6 in 2024, and the May 2026 monthly peak was 432.3; NOAA puts today’s rate of increase at more than 100 times the rate at the end of the last ice age. The extra carbon carries the isotopic signature of fossil fuel.
Claim“The media exaggerates, it’s not that bad”
EvidencePartly, on the framings in the coverage section: single events, deadlines and the 1.5 °C line are oversimplified in coverage, and “no warming since X” is a choice of start year. The older fault ran the other way: 53% of articles in four U.S. papers from 1988 to 2002 gave equal weight to the two positions (Boykoff and Boykoff, 2004), while 90% of articles across five countries from 2005 to 2019 represented the science accurately (McAllister et al., 2021). This page does not measure whether coverage understates damages.
Claim“Scientists keep revising their models, they don’t know anything”
EvidenceThe IPCC’s best estimate for a doubling of CO₂ is 3 °C, likely 2.5 to 4, a narrower range than in its previous assessment (SPM A.4). Of 17 model projections published between 1970 and 2007, 14 matched the warming that followed once actual emissions were substituted for the projected ones, and 10 did so as published (Hausfather et al., 2020). The open questions are elsewhere, above all in how the ice sheets will behave.
Download the conclusion
This card gives the answer: on the IPCC’s assessment the planet is about 1.1 °C warmer than in 1850–1900, and of the 1.06 °C observed in 2010–2019 its best estimate of the human share is 1.07, with the sun and volcanoes within a tenth of a degree either way. It is 1,200 by 630 pixels, the size social networks use for link previews, and anyone may download it and post it.
Download the card (PNG, 1,200 × 630)
What would change this conclusion
This article concludes that: (1) the planet warmed about 1.1 °C from 1850–1900 to 2011–2020 on the IPCC’s assessment of four independent surface records, and the analyses put 2024 between 1.46 and 1.62; (2) the warming is human-caused, with greenhouse gases contributing 1.0 to 2.0 °C and natural drivers ±0.1; (3) CO₂ is at its highest in at least 800,000 years and rising more than 100 times faster than at the end of the last ice age; (4) the ocean, sea level and ice carry the same signal; (5) past model projections have tracked the warming.
This would change if:
1. The four surface records were shown to share a systematic error of about 1 °C, and the satellite records of the lower troposphere diverged from them.
2. Satellite measurements showed solar irradiance rising since 1980, or a natural mechanism were found that produces the greenhouse fingerprints: stratospheric cooling, faster warming at night, less heat escaping in the carbon dioxide bands.
3. Isotopic measurements of atmospheric CO₂ stopped matching fossil-fuel carbon, or independent stations diverged from Mauna Loa.
4. The IPCC’s next assessment put the human contribution below half of the observed warming.
5. A published evaluation found most past model projections outside the observed range once actual emissions were used.
Primary sources cited
IPCC AR6 Synthesis Report, longer report (2023), and the WGI Summary for Policymakers A.1.2 and A.1.3 (2021). Source for 1.09 [0.95 to 1.20] °C in 2011–2020 against 1850–1900, 0.99 for 2001–2020, and the attribution ranges: greenhouse gases 1.0 to 2.0, other human drivers 0.0 to −0.8, human total 1.07 (0.8 to 1.3), natural ±0.1, internal variability ±0.2.
ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. Mauna Loa annual mean CO₂, co2_annmean_mlo.txt. Source for every annual mean from 2010 (390.10) to 2023 (421.08) in the CO₂ chart and stat block; the 2024 mean of 424.61 is NOAA’s figure as reproduced by others. The May 2025 and May 2026 monthly peaks, 430.5 and 432.3 ppm, are NOAA GML’s figures as reported in Scripps Institution of Oceanography’s releases of June 2025 and June 2026.
gml.noaa.gov
NASA. NASA Analysis Shows Unexpected Amount of Sea Level Rise in 2024, March 2025. Source for the 2024 rate of 0.59 cm a year against an expected 0.43, the more-than-doubling of the rate since 1993, the roughly 10 cm of rise since 1993, and the two-thirds ice-melt, one-third thermal-expansion split that reversed in 2024.
nasa.gov
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio. Global Temperature Anomalies from 1880 to 2024, and 2020 Tied for Warmest Year on Record. Source for the GISTEMP anomalies of 1.28 °C in 2024 and 1.02 in 2020 and 2016, relative to 1951–1980.
svs.gsfc.nasa.gov
World Meteorological Organization. WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record, 14 January 2026; Copernicus Climate Change Service, Global Climate Highlights 2025; Berkeley Earth, Global Temperature Report for 2025. Sources for 2025 at 1.44 ± 0.13 °C on the WMO’s consolidated analysis of eight datasets (third on six, second on two), 1.47 on Copernicus’s ERA5 after 1.60 in 2024, 1.44 ± 0.09 on Berkeley Earth’s, and the eleven warmest years being 2015 to 2025 on all eight datasets.
wmo.int
Pan, Cheng et al. Ocean Heat Content Sets Another Record in 2025. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2026; Cheng et al., Record high temperatures in the ocean in 2024, 2025. Source for the upper-2,000 m ocean heat content rising about 23 ± 8 zettajoules in 2025 over 2024, itself about 16 ± 8 above 2023, across the IAP, NOAA/NCEI and Copernicus Marine products.
michaelmann.net (paper PDF)
NSIDC, 2025 Arctic sea ice minimum squeezes into the ten lowest minimums, September 2025; NOAA Climate.gov on the 2025 winter maximum. Source for the 4.60 million square kilometre minimum on 10 September 2025, tied tenth lowest, the last 19 years as the 19 lowest with no significant trend among them, and the September decline of 12.1 ± 1.8% per decade over 1979–2024 relative to 1981–2010.
climate.gov
World Glacier Monitoring Service, Global Glacier State; M. Pelto, Alpine Glaciers, State of the Climate 2019 and 2024 (Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society), as reproduced by NOAA Climate.gov and the NCAR Climate Data Guide. Source for the reference network’s decade averages (−171 mm a year in the 1980s, −460 in the 1990s, −500 in the 2000s, −889 in the 2010s), the annual losses of 1.1, 1.2 and 1.30 m w.e. in 2022, 2023 and 2024, 2024 as the most negative year and the 37th consecutive year of loss, all 58 reference glaciers negative in 2023 and 2024, and 142 glaciers reporting for 2024.
wgms.ch
Berkeley Earth. Global Temperature Report for 2024 (January 2025) and Global Temperature Report for 2023; Copernicus Climate Change Service, Global Climate Highlights 2024. Sources for Berkeley’s 1.62 ± 0.06 °C for 2024 and 1.54 for 2023, both above 1.5 on its analysis; Copernicus’s 1.60 for 2024, the WMO’s consolidated 1.55 ± 0.13, and the 1.46 to 1.62 spread of the centres’ own 2024 figures, which Copernicus attributes to each centre’s own 1850–1900 estimate.
berkeleyearth.org
Supran, Rahmstorf and Oreskes. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science, 13 January 2023. Source for the company scientists’ projections of 0.20 ± 0.04 °C of warming a decade between 1977 and 2003, their consistency with observations, and the contradiction with the company’s public statements.
doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063
NOAA, statement on the first 400 ppm daily reading at Mauna Loa, May 2013, as reported by The Hill. Source for CO₂ varying between about 180 ppm in ice ages and 280 ppm in interglacials over the last 800,000 years, pre-industrial levels of roughly 280 ppm, and today’s rate of increase being more than 100 times faster than at the end of the last ice age.
thehill.com
Hausfather, Drake, Abbott and Schmidt. Evaluating the performance of past climate model projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020. Source for the 17 model projections published between 1970 and 2007, of which 10 matched the warming that followed as published and 14 did once actual emissions and other forcings were substituted for the projected ones.
realclimate.org (Schmidt’s summary of the paper)
IPCC AR6 Synthesis Report, Figure 3.4 (2023), and WGI SPM A.1.7 (2021). Source for the likely sea level rise by 2100 relative to 1995–2014 (0.28 to 0.55 m under SSP1-1.9, 0.44 to 0.76 under SSP2-4.5, 0.63 to 1.01 under SSP5-8.5), the low-likelihood rise approaching 2 m that cannot be ruled out, and the rates of 1.3 mm a year for 1901 to 1971, 1.9 for 1971 to 2006 and 3.7 for 2006 to 2018.
ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/figures/figure-3-4
Boykoff and Boykoff. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 2004, as described in UC Santa Cruz’s release; McAllister et al., Balance as bias, resolute uncertainty, and the weaponization of doubt, Environmental Research Letters, 2021. Sources for the 636 articles of 1988 to 2002 (52.7% balanced, 35.3% emphasising the human role, 6.2% emphasising doubt, 5.8% the scientific position only) and for the 90% of 4,856 articles from 17 papers in five countries, 2005 to 2019, that represented the science accurately.
scholar.colorado.edu (McAllister et al.)
NASA. Global Mean Sea Level, the vital-signs pages of climate.nasa.gov and sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov (Willis et al., 2025; Beckley et al., 2017 dataset). Source for the satellite record’s rise of 10.7 cm from 1993 to the latest reading, 102 ± 4 mm at January 2025, and the annual rate’s increase from 0.20 cm a year in 1993 to 0.44 now.
sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov
NASA GISTEMP Team. Global Annual Temperature Anomalies (Land + Ocean), 1880–2015, relative to 1951–1980, as mirrored by datahub.io; NASA’s releases on 2016, 2020, 2022 and 2024. Source for chart 1’s values: the mirror’s table for 1980 to 2014 (within 0.02 °C of the values plotted, the difference being later revisions of the analysis), and NASA’s own figures of 1.02 for 2016 and 2020, 0.89 for 2022 and 1.28 for 2024.
datahub.io (mirror of the NASA table)
Cheng et al. Another Year of Record Heat for the Oceans (2023); New Record Ocean Temperatures and Related Climate Indicators in 2023 (2024); Record High Temperatures in the Ocean in 2024 (2025), Advances in Atmospheric Sciences; Cheng et al., Ocean heat content in 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2024. Sources for the year-on-year rises in upper-2,000 m ocean heat content: 10.9 ± 8.3 ZJ in 2022, 15 ± 10 (IAP) and 9 ± 5 (NCEI) in 2023, 16 ± 8 in 2024, and for records being broken every year since 2017.
repository.library.noaa.gov
Scafetta, Willson, Lee and Wu. Modeling Quiet Solar Luminosity Variability from TSI Satellite Measurements and Proxy Models during 1980–2018. Remote Sensing, 2019; Fröhlich and Lean (PMOD, 1998) and Willson (ACRIM, 1999) as summarised by Skeptical Science. Sources for the satellite record of total solar irradiance since 1978, the dispute over the 1989 to 1991 gap that separates the ACRIM and PMOD composites, ACRIM’s slight rise to 2000 and decline since, and PMOD’s slight decline throughout.
ntrs.nasa.gov
Brulle. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change 122, 2014. Source for the 91 organisations, their combined annual income of just over $900 million in 2003 to 2010, the $64 million a year of identifiable foundation support, and the caveat that the total is income rather than climate spending.
drexel.edu (paper PDF)
Harries et al., Nature, 2001; Griggs and Harries, 2004; Chen et al., 2007; Philipona et al., 2004; Evans, 2006; Wang and Liang, 2009, as summarised by Skeptical Science. Sources for the fall in outgoing radiation in the CO₂ and methane bands between the 1970 IRIS and 1997 IMG satellite spectra, its confirmation to 2006 with AIRS and AURA, and the measured rise in downward longwave radiation at the surface, 1973 to 2008, attributable gas by gas.
skepticalscience.com
NASA. Temperatures Rising: NASA Confirms 2024 Warmest Year on Record, 10 January 2025. Source for 2024 at 1.28 °C above NASA’s 1951–1980 baseline and about 1.47 above 1850–1900.
nasa.gov
NOAA Climate.gov. Climate change: global temperature, from NOAA NCEI’s 2024 annual report. Source for 2024 at 1.29 °C above the 20th-century average and 1.46 above the 1850–1900 average, the warmest year in NOAA’s record from 1850.
climate.gov
IPCC AR6 WGI, Figure 2.11 data, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (the IPCC’s data distribution centre). Source for the four global surface temperature datasets the assessment used: HadCRUT5, NOAAGlobalTemp, Berkeley Earth and Kadow et al.
catalogue.ceda.ac.uk
Otosaka et al. Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020 (IMBIE). Earth System Science Data 15, 2023; Otosaka, IMBIE presentation, ESA Living Planet Symposium, 2022. Sources for the three techniques, the 21.0 ± 1.9 mm contribution to sea level, the loss rising from 105 to 372 billion tonnes a year, East Antarctica close to balance and the most uncertain part, and the techniques’ close agreement on Greenland and disagreement on East Antarctica’s sign.
essd.copernicus.org
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. The Data: What 13C Tells Us; Keeling et al., PNAS, 2017, in NOAA’s repository. Sources for the atmosphere’s carbon-13 signature falling from about −6.5 to about −8 parts per thousand, the Suess effect, and the decline measured directly since 1978 and in ice cores since the industrial revolution.
gml.noaa.gov
Science History Institute. Future Calculations, Distillations magazine; Penn State, EARTH 104, Greenhouse Gases. Sources for Fourier in 1824, Tyndall’s laboratory measurements of 1859 (oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen transparent to infrared; water vapour, carbon dioxide and methane absorbing it) and Arrhenius’s doubling calculation of 1896.
sciencehistory.org
Wickham et al. (Berkeley Earth). Influence of Urban Heating on the Global Temperature Land Average Using Rural Sites Identified from MODIS Classifications, as reported by Carbon Brief, October 2011, and Skeptical Science. Source for the 39,028 sites, the 16,132 very rural ones, the opposite of an urban warming effect over 1950 to 2010, and the 99% of the surface that is not urban.
carbonbrief.org
Karl et al., 2006; Santer et al., 2013; Braganza et al., 2004; Alexander et al., 2006, as summarised by Skeptical Science. Sources for the stratosphere cooling while the troposphere warms, in satellite and weather-balloon records, and for the land diurnal range narrowing about 0.4 °C over 50 years, with minimums up about 0.9 and maximums about 0.6.
skepticalscience.com
IPCC AR6 WGI, Headline Statements from the Summary for Policymakers (2021); the SPM’s Figure SPM.2 as presented by an AR6 author at JAMSTEC. Sources for statements A.4 (best estimate of climate sensitivity 3 °C), C.1 (natural variability modulating change, especially regionally and in the near term) and C.3 (low-likelihood outcomes that cannot be ruled out), and for the observed 2010–2019 warming of 1.06 (0.88 to 1.21) °C.
ipcc.ch
The Nordhaus–Stern discounting debate, as summarised in Springer’s chapter on climate economics and by the Carbon Tax Center (2014). Sources for Nordhaus’s discount rate of about 4 to 5% against the Stern Review’s 1.4%, the “policy ramp” of modest early cuts, and the optimal path in DICE-2013 limiting warming to about 3 °C.
link.springer.com
Rantanen et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment, 2022. Source for the Arctic warming nearly four times (3.8 times) as fast as the globe over 1979 to 2021 across several observational datasets, a ratio the authors say depends on how the Arctic is defined and which climate models underestimate.
doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3
Lynas, Houlton and Perry. Greater than 99% Consensus on Human Caused Climate Change in the Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, as described by Cornell University; Cook et al., 2013, as described there. Source for the sample of 3,000 papers from 88,125, the four sceptical papers, the 69% taking no position, and Cook’s 97% of abstracts taking a position between 1991 and 2012.
news.cornell.edu
Cite this article
TruthBased.org. “Is Climate Change Real and Human-Caused?” Updated September 2026. https://www.truthbased.org/is-climate-change-real-and-human-caused